Primary fork · FORK 2Within 15–40 years

Utopia or dystopia

If we do make it through, what kind of world is on the other side — abundance for everyone, or concentration of power into very few hands?

Timeline A35%

Utopia

Abundance economics, material and cognitive. Radical individual freedom and flourishing become the baseline. Work is optional, meaning is self-chosen.

Timeline B45%

Dystopia

Power concentrates with whoever controls compute and data. Mass surveillance becomes the substrate. Suffering gets cheap. Meaning collapses faster than it can be rebuilt.

The timeline nobody's watching

Mixed-regime equilibrium

Pockets of utopia and pockets of dystopia at the same time. Where you live, what passport you hold, and which network you plug into decide which world you get.

35%45%
UtopiaMixed-regime equilibriumDystopia

Two poles are doing most of the pulling. One pole we’re watching for upset.

Timeline A pull strength 35%, Timeline B pull strength 45%, third pole explicitly watched. Remaining 14% is unaccounted-for structural possibility.

What shifts you between these timelines

Every lever below is something an actor can push on. Changing one of these moves pull strength between the two timelines in a way downstream readings should pick up.

  • Compute concentration vs decentralization

    Whether frontier compute stays with three labs or spreads to thousands.

  • Labor-displacement response

    Does policy catch up with the pace of automation, or lag until the social contract snaps.

  • Open-source vs frontier-lab gatekeeping

    How much capability stays behind closed APIs vs how much is openly releasable.

  • Agentic-substrate deployment governance

    The rules that decide what autonomous systems are allowed to do, and who gets to deploy them.

Live signals affecting this fork

Open signals feed →

Barrier-breaking crossings the tracker has logged against this fork — sourced events, dates, and which other forks each crossing tilts.

Readings feeding this timeline split

40 readings · 6 topics

The full set of live readings whose structural read bears on which timeline wins this split, grouped by topic. Each row opens the reading’s own page with pull strengths, levers, and evidence.

Tech · 24

Show 19 more in Tech ↓

Cognitive/institutional adaptation lag — tech-tempo exceeds human-institutional-tempo?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 40 · B 60
Reality: A 40%, B 60%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2027

A publicly released AI model passes 50% on FrontierMath by end of 2027?

tech · A Threshold Hit / B Still Short
A 78 · B 22
Reality: A 78%, B 22%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2027

A publicly-released AI model achieves 85% or higher on SWE-bench Verified at some point during 2027?

tech · A Benchmark Cleared / B Still Short
A 70 · B 30
Reality: A 70%, B 30%. Crowd puts A at 60%. Gap minus 10.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

−1031 Jan 2028

An openly-released AI model holds a top-5 spot on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard at some point during 2027?

tech · A Open Model Wins / B Closed Dominates
A 75 · B 25
Reality: A 75%, B 25%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Jan 2028

Narrative-tempo of AI discourse — cycle duration?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 50 · B 50
Reality: A 50%, B 50%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Compute-doubling-time (frontier training-run FLOPS) saturates?

tech · A Timeline A / B Frontier Compute-doubling Continues
A 60 · B 40
Reality: A 60%, B 40%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Agentic-substrate deployment tempo first-wave adoption?

tech · A Timeline A / B Adoption Stays Slow
A 43 · B 57
Reality: A 43%, B 57%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

AI-safety research-to-deployment capability-safety-gap?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 40 · B 60
Reality: A 40%, B 60%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Energy infrastructure substrate — tempo of GW-scale AI power build-out?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 60 · B 40
Reality: A 60%, B 40%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Frontier-model release-interval saturation inflection?

tech · A Timeline A / B Through 2028 Frontier
A 57 · B 43
Reality: A 57%, B 43%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Second-derivative tempo — rate-of-change OF tech-cycle acceleration itself?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 57 · B 43
Reality: A 57%, B 43%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Chip-supply-chain tempo — HBM + advanced packaging as rate-limiting?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 57 · B 43
Reality: A 57%, B 43%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Hardware substrate (Moore + algorithm density) net tempo?

tech · A Chip Density And / B Power Walls Manufacturing
A 57 · B 43
Reality: A 57%, B 43%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Consumer adoption S-curve compression — new category reaches 100M users?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 50 · B 50
Reality: A 50%, B 50%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Research-to-deployment tempo compression (publication → production)?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 57 · B 43
Reality: A 57%, B 43%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

Capital-cycle tempo compression — AI investment cycle duration?

tech · A Timeline A / B Ai Investment Cycles
A 50 · B 50
Reality: A 50%, B 50%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2028

AI capability: breakthrough or plateau?

tech · A Breakthrough / B Plateau
A 65 · B 35
Reality: A 65%, B 35%. Crowd puts A at 70%. Gap plus 5.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

+531 Dec 2028

Regulatory response-tempo compression on frontier tech?

tech · A Timeline A / B Timeline B
A 54 · B 46
Reality: A 54%, B 46%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2029

AI reaches research-mathematics parity with human mathematicians ahead of 2030 horizon?

tech · A By Late 2029 / B Through 2029 Ai
A 60 · B 40
Reality: A 60%, B 40%. No market signal.

Quiet path · not yet modeled

No market signal

031 Dec 2029

Climate & energy · 5

Finance · 4

US labor · 4

Coverage expands as the methodology pipeline scores every reading against every fork. Topics may appear or regroup as scoring lands.