Primary fork · FORK 1Within 10–30 years

The great filter

Does the species make it through the next decade in some recognizable form, or does one of the biggest risks actually fire?

Timeline A55%

World transforms

Humanity makes it through — transformed, with abundance and new structures, but still here as a species. The hardest problems get solved before the hardest problems kill us.

Timeline B30%

World ends

A catastrophic phase failure fires first. Species-level collapse through climate, biosecurity, nuclear, or an AI-adjacent cascade before cooperation catches up.

The timeline nobody's watching

World fragments

Local collapses and local phase-transitions happen in parallel. No single global outcome — the world splits into zones with wildly different fates.

55%30%
World transformsWorld fragmentsWorld ends

Two poles are doing most of the pulling. One pole we’re watching for upset.

Timeline A pull strength 55%, Timeline B pull strength 30%, third pole explicitly watched. Remaining 9% is unaccounted-for structural possibility.
Keep orthogonal

FORK_1 captures any species-level catastrophe — not necessarily AI-related. A climate collapse that ends humanity while AI persists is FORK_4a but not FORK_1-A. Keep these orthogonal.

What shifts you between these timelines

Every lever below is something an actor can push on. Changing one of these moves pull strength between the two timelines in a way downstream readings should pick up.

  • AI alignment research pace

    How fast the field proves that frontier systems do what we meant, not what we literally said.

  • Nuclear restraint and arms control

    Whether the current drift of eroding treaties reverses in time, or compounds into a doctrine shift.

  • Biosecurity preparedness

    Pandemic-response infrastructure, DNA synthesis screening, and dual-use biology containment.

  • Climate response speed

    Deployment pace of grid-scale clean energy and whether tipping-point feedbacks fire first.

Live signals affecting this fork

Open signals feed →

Barrier-breaking crossings the tracker has logged against this fork — sourced events, dates, and which other forks each crossing tilts.

Readings feeding this timeline split

16 readings · 3 topics

The full set of live readings whose structural read bears on which timeline wins this split, grouped by topic. Each row opens the reading’s own page with pull strengths, levers, and evidence.

Geopolitics · 10

Show 5 more in Geopolitics ↓

Climate & energy · 5

Coverage expands as the methodology pipeline scores every reading against every fork. Topics may appear or regroup as scoring lands.